CiberLATAMbywhalemate

COMAPA Victoria linked to Qilin

ACSec, Víctor Ruiz and FalconFeeds.io attributed a supposed Qilin attack to COMAPA Victoria, without independent confirmation.

Whalemate Labs · AI-assisted researchPublished:1 min read

COMAPA Victoria was listed by ACSec’s Ransomware Observatory as a reported Qilin victim in Mexico, although the record itself says it only reflects public metadata posted by the groups. At the same time, Víctor Ruiz/SILIKN and FalconFeeds.io said the agency had been affected, but without official confirmation or independent technical evidence.

COMAPA Victoria was recorded by ACSec’s Ransomware Observatory as a possible Qilin victim in Mexico, although the database makes clear that it only reproduces public metadata released by the groups themselves. The claim was also echoed by Víctor Ruiz/SILIKN and FalconFeeds.io, which described a supposed attack without official confirmation or independent technical evidence.

What did ACSec record?

ACSec listed the Comisión Municipal de Agua Potable y Alcantarillado de Victoria among the victims disclosed by Qilin and noted that its database is built from public metadata published by the actors themselves. That clarification keeps the entry in the realm of preliminary attribution, not forensic verification of the incident.

The entry appears in Qilin’s observatory with a date of October 13, 2026. The material provided does not include any additional validation of data access, the scope of the incident, or the impact on the commission’s systems.

What did the other reports say?

Víctor Ruiz, through SILIKN, reported that Qilin had supposedly attacked COMAPA Victoria and said there would be a countdown of about four days to begin negotiations. In the same post, he called for an investigation into whether information or operational systems had been compromised.

FalconFeeds.io also said COMAPA Victoria had been a victim of Qilin and estimated that the group intended to publish the data in 5 to 6 days. That post also offered no technical evidence or official confirmation, so the case remains supported only by third-party attribution.

What can be said so far?

The only traceable facts in the available material are a claim attributed to Qilin and repeated by two specialized accounts, plus the ACSec record that reproduces it as public metadata. The sources provided do not include independent confirmation of the attack, of any access to information, or of a possible publication later on.

Sources

View all